Match statistics snapshot
- Orlando City SC created the clearer chances on xG (1.77 vs 1.30, Δ 0.47).
- Orlando City SC fired more attempts (16 vs 7 shots).
- Chicago Fire was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 1.77Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.30 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 87% |
| 498Lead | Accurate passes | 367 |
| 564Lead | Total passes | 423 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 0.70 | Goals prevented | 0.70 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |