Match statistics snapshot
- Columbus Crew created the clearer chances on xG (1.90 vs 3.89, Δ 1.99).
- Columbus Crew fired more attempts (15 vs 14 shots).
- Columbus Crew was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 50%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 1.90 | Expected goals (xG) | 3.89Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 7 | Shots on target | 10Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 355 | Accurate passes | 405Lead |
| 427 | Total passes | 477Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |