Match statistics snapshot
- Columbus Crew created the clearer chances on xG (1.31 vs 1.59, Δ 0.28).
- Orlando City SC fired more attempts (13 vs 8 shots).
- Columbus Crew held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 1.31 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.59Lead |
| 6 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 89% | Pass accuracy | 91%Lead |
| 416 | Accurate passes | 529Lead |
| 466 | Total passes | 583Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 2.37 | Goals prevented | 2.37 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |