Match statistics snapshot
- Columbus Crew created the clearer chances on xG (0.99 vs 3.21, Δ 2.22).
- Columbus Crew fired more attempts (21 vs 10 shots).
- Orlando City SC was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 0.99 | Expected goals (xG) | 3.21Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 15Lead |
| 2 | Shots off target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 21Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 92%Lead |
| 310 | Accurate passes | 502Lead |
| 365 | Total passes | 543Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 9Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| -0.39 | Goals prevented | -0.39 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |