Match statistics snapshot
- FC Cincinnati created the clearer chances on xG (0.29 vs 1.20, Δ 0.91).
- FC Cincinnati fired more attempts (11 vs 7 shots).
- FC Cincinnati was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 0.29 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.20Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 363 | Accurate passes | 510Lead |
| 435 | Total passes | 576Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |