Match statistics snapshot
- FC Cincinnati created the clearer chances on xG (0.41 vs 1.02, Δ 0.61).
- Orlando City SC fired more attempts (8 vs 7 shots).
- FC Cincinnati held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 0.41 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.02Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 281 | Accurate passes | 452Lead |
| 351 | Total passes | 520Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 20 |
| 1 | Red cards | 1 |
| 4 | Yellow cards | 4 |