Match statistics snapshot
- Orlando City SC created the clearer chances on xG (1.87 vs 0.55, Δ 1.32).
- Orlando City SC fired more attempts (17 vs 9 shots).
- FC Cincinnati was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 1.87Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.55 |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 7Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 466Lead | Accurate passes | 301 |
| 526Lead | Total passes | 371 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -0.24 | Goals prevented | -0.24 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.