Match statistics snapshot
- Orlando City SC created the clearer chances on xG (1.96 vs 1.35, Δ 0.61).
- Orlando City SC fired more attempts (17 vs 11 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 1.96Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.35 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 8 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 89% | Pass accuracy | 93%Lead |
| 397 | Accurate passes | 420Lead |
| 445 | Total passes | 451Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 1.41 | Goals prevented | 1.41 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |