Match statistics snapshot
- Orlando City SC created the clearer chances on xG (1.47 vs 0.75, Δ 0.72).
- Orlando City SC fired more attempts (13 vs 9 shots).
- Inter Miami was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 46%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 1.47Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.75 |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 330Lead | Accurate passes | 316 |
| 397Lead | Total passes | 385 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |