Match statistics snapshot
- Orlando City SC created the clearer chances on xG (0.73 vs 0.57, Δ 0.16).
- Orlando City SC fired more attempts (14 vs 7 shots).
- Inter Miami was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 0.73Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.57 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 87% | Pass accuracy | 90%Lead |
| 336 | Accurate passes | 515Lead |
| 388 | Total passes | 572Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.