Match statistics snapshot
- Orlando City SC created the clearer chances on xG (1.62 vs 1.35, Δ 0.27).
- Orlando City SC fired more attempts (14 vs 9 shots).
- Nashville SC was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 43%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.62Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.35 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 6 | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 89% | Pass accuracy | 91%Lead |
| 343 | Accurate passes | 594Lead |
| 387 | Total passes | 653Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| -0.75 | Goals prevented | -0.75 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |