Match statistics snapshot
- Orlando City SC created the clearer chances on xG (1.87 vs 1.10, Δ 0.77).
- Orlando City SC fired more attempts (20 vs 9 shots).
- Orlando City SC held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 1.87Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.10 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 86% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 382Lead | Accurate passes | 329 |
| 442Lead | Total passes | 368 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -1.08 | Goals prevented | -1.08 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.