Match statistics snapshot
- Orlando City SC created the clearer chances on xG (1.54 vs 0.35, Δ 1.19).
- Orlando City SC fired more attempts (14 vs 7 shots).
- Orlando City SC was more accurate in front of goal (29% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 1.54Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.35 |
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots off target | 4 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 90%Lead |
| 342 | Accurate passes | 527Lead |
| 403 | Total passes | 586Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| 0.71 | Goals prevented | 0.71 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |