Match statistics snapshot
- Orlando City SC fired more attempts (10 vs 6 shots).
- Orlando City SC was more accurate in front of goal (30% on target vs 17%).
- Tigres UANL held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 84% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 347 | Accurate passes | 442Lead |
| 411 | Total passes | 510Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |