Match statistics snapshot
- Toronto FC created the clearer chances on xG (1.09 vs 1.80, Δ 0.71).
- Toronto FC fired more attempts (13 vs 8 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.09 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.80Lead |
| 3Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 3 |
| 5Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 84% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 423 | Accurate passes | 454Lead |
| 502 | Total passes | 529Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 4 |