Match statistics snapshot
- Vancouver Whitecaps created the clearer chances on xG (0.94 vs 2.43, Δ 1.49).
- Vancouver Whitecaps fired more attempts (24 vs 4 shots).
- Orlando City SC was more accurate in front of goal (75% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 0.94 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.43Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 16Lead |
| 0 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 10Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Total shots | 24Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 31% | Ball possession | 69%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 90%Lead |
| 217 | Accurate passes | 541Lead |
| 279 | Total passes | 600Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0.02 | Goals prevented | 0.02 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |