Match statistics snapshot
- Orlando Pride W fired more attempts (14 vs 7 shots).
- Orlando Pride W was more accurate in front of goal (64% on target vs 0%).
- North Carolina Courage W held more of the ball (66% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Orlando Pride W | Statistic | North Carolina Courage W |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2Lead | Offsides | 6 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Orlando Pride W | Statistic | North Carolina Courage W |
|---|---|---|
| 34% | Ball possession | 66%Lead |
| 68% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 205 | Accurate passes | 504Lead |
| 302 | Total passes | 600Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Orlando Pride W | Statistic | North Carolina Courage W |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Orlando Pride W | Statistic | North Carolina Courage W |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Orlando Pride W | Statistic | North Carolina Courage W |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |