Match statistics snapshot
- Osasuna created the clearer chances on xG (1.37 vs 1.34, Δ 0.03).
- Osasuna fired more attempts (16 vs 13 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Osasuna | Statistic | Oviedo |
|---|---|---|
1.37Lead | Expected goals (xG)Quality of chances created — not just shot count. | 1.34 |
0Lead | OffsidesTiming of runs — high counts can mean aggressive lines. | 2 |
12Lead | Shots inside the box | 10 |
6 | Shots off target | 6 |
5 | Shots on target | 5 |
4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
16Lead | Total shotsAll attempts including blocked and off-target. | 13 |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Osasuna | Statistic | Oviedo |
|---|---|---|
51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
77% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
261 | Accurate passes | 264Lead |
339Lead | Total passes | 331 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Osasuna | Statistic | Oviedo |
|---|---|---|
3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Osasuna | Statistic | Oviedo |
|---|---|---|
5Lead | Blocked shotsDefensive actions — also counts as part of attacking pressure faced. | 2 |
3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
-0.94 | Goals preventedKeeper performance vs expected — positive is above average. | -0.94 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Osasuna | Statistic | Oviedo |
|---|---|---|
14Lead | Fouls | 15 |
1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Scouting-style duels — each row compares both teams, shows share of the pie, and who had the edge. Categories summarize who won more signals.
How clinical and dangerous each attack was — not just how often they shot, but where and how good those chances were.
Oviedo leads this block
Oviedo leads shot accuracy (+23% vs Osasuna)
Oviedo leads shot accuracy (+23% vs Osasuna)
Oviedo leads shot quality (+20% vs Osasuna)
Oviedo leads (77% vs 75%).
Playing style signals: whether chances came from patient possession or direct vertical play.
Oviedo — slower buildup (more passes per shot)
Oviedo leads (0.027 vs 0.027).
Oviedo — slower buildup (more passes per shot)
Territorial dominance built from box presence, set pieces, and sustained threat.
Osasuna leads this block
Osasuna had the edge in 1 of 1 signals in this block.
Osasuna leads (37 vs 33).
How well each side limited chance quality and how demanding the keepers’ workload was.
Oviedo leads this block
Oviedo — stronger shot quality allowed
Oviedo — stronger shot quality allowed
Oviedo leads keeper workload (+53% vs Osasuna)
Archetype ratings you can map to card modifiers, AI behaviour, or match narratives.
Oviedo leads this block
Oviedo had the edge in 4 of 6 signals in this block.
Oviedo leads (23.0 vs 21.0).
Osasuna leads (39.3 vs 39.2).
Oviedo leads (16.0 vs 15.0).
Oviedo leads (0.103 vs 0.086).
Oviedo leads (91.4 vs 89.7).
Osasuna leads (23.0 vs 21.0).