Match statistics snapshot
- Osters IF created the clearer chances on xG (1.84 vs 1.54, Δ 0.30).
- IFK Norrkoping was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 25%).
- Osters IF held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Osters If | Statistic | Ifk Norrkoping |
|---|---|---|
| 1.84Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.54 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Osters If | Statistic | Ifk Norrkoping |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 76%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 356Lead | Accurate passes | 315 |
| 466Lead | Total passes | 423 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Osters If | Statistic | Ifk Norrkoping |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Osters If | Statistic | Ifk Norrkoping |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Osters If | Statistic | Ifk Norrkoping |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.