Match statistics snapshot
- Osters IF created the clearer chances on xG (1.71 vs 1.12, Δ 0.59).
- Sandviken fired more attempts (17 vs 9 shots).
- Osters IF was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Osters If | Statistic | Sandviken |
|---|---|---|
| 1.71Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.12 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 12Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Osters If | Statistic | Sandviken |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 270 | Accurate passes | 371Lead |
| 327 | Total passes | 443Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Osters If | Statistic | Sandviken |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Osters If | Statistic | Sandviken |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Osters If | Statistic | Sandviken |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 14 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.