Match statistics snapshot
- Oţelul created the clearer chances on xG (1.77 vs 0.27, Δ 1.50).
- Oţelul fired more attempts (12 vs 5 shots).
- Oţelul was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Oţelul | Statistic | Afc Hermannstadt |
|---|---|---|
| 1.77Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.27 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Oţelul | Statistic | Afc Hermannstadt |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 77%Lead | Pass accuracy | 65% |
| 375Lead | Accurate passes | 201 |
| 484Lead | Total passes | 308 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Oţelul | Statistic | Afc Hermannstadt |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Oţelul | Statistic | Afc Hermannstadt |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Oţelul | Statistic | Afc Hermannstadt |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |