Match statistics snapshot
- AFC Hermannstadt created the clearer chances on xG (0.57 vs 1.51, Δ 0.94).
- AFC Hermannstadt fired more attempts (10 vs 6 shots).
- AFC Hermannstadt held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Oţelul | Statistic | Afc Hermannstadt |
|---|---|---|
| 0.57 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.51Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 10Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Oţelul | Statistic | Afc Hermannstadt |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 71% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 234 | Accurate passes | 401Lead |
| 328 | Total passes | 503Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Oţelul | Statistic | Afc Hermannstadt |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Oţelul | Statistic | Afc Hermannstadt |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Oţelul | Statistic | Afc Hermannstadt |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |