Match statistics snapshot
- AFC Hermannstadt created the clearer chances on xG (0.03 vs 1.59, Δ 1.56).
- AFC Hermannstadt fired more attempts (16 vs 3 shots).
- AFC Hermannstadt held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Oţelul | Statistic | Afc Hermannstadt |
|---|---|---|
| 0.03 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.59Lead |
| 5 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 1 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Oţelul | Statistic | Afc Hermannstadt |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 63% | Pass accuracy | 78%Lead |
| 197 | Accurate passes | 298Lead |
| 312 | Total passes | 382Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Oţelul | Statistic | Afc Hermannstadt |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Oţelul | Statistic | Afc Hermannstadt |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Oţelul | Statistic | Afc Hermannstadt |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| 3 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |