Match statistics snapshot
- Oţelul created the clearer chances on xG (1.04 vs 0.61, Δ 0.43).
- Oţelul fired more attempts (15 vs 11 shots).
- Oţelul was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Oţelul | Statistic | Afc Hermannstadt |
|---|---|---|
| 1.04Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.61 |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Oţelul | Statistic | Afc Hermannstadt |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 75%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 270Lead | Accurate passes | 251 |
| 358Lead | Total passes | 340 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Oţelul | Statistic | Afc Hermannstadt |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Oţelul | Statistic | Afc Hermannstadt |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Oţelul | Statistic | Afc Hermannstadt |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |