Match statistics snapshot
- Oţelul created the clearer chances on xG (1.20 vs 1.05, Δ 0.15).
- Oţelul fired more attempts (15 vs 13 shots).
- Oţelul was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Oţelul | Statistic | Farul Constanta |
|---|---|---|
| 1.20Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.05 |
| 3Lead | Offsides | 6 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 7 | Shots outside the box | 7 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Oţelul | Statistic | Farul Constanta |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 67%Lead | Pass accuracy | 66% |
| 279Lead | Accurate passes | 260 |
| 419Lead | Total passes | 391 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Oţelul | Statistic | Farul Constanta |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Oţelul | Statistic | Farul Constanta |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Oţelul | Statistic | Farul Constanta |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.