Match statistics snapshot
- FC Botosani created the clearer chances on xG (0.34 vs 1.20, Δ 0.86).
- FC Botosani was more accurate in front of goal (86% on target vs 0%).
- Oţelul held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Oţelul | Statistic | Fc Botosani |
|---|---|---|
| 0.34 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.20Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 4Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 0 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Oţelul | Statistic | Fc Botosani |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 69%Lead | Pass accuracy | 64% |
| 282Lead | Accurate passes | 196 |
| 409Lead | Total passes | 307 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Oţelul | Statistic | Fc Botosani |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Oţelul | Statistic | Fc Botosani |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Oţelul | Statistic | Fc Botosani |
|---|---|---|
| 19Lead | Fouls | 21 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.