Match statistics snapshot
- FCSB created the clearer chances on xG (1.91 vs 3.67, Δ 1.76).
- FCSB fired more attempts (19 vs 13 shots).
- FCSB was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 23%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Oţelul | Statistic | Fcsb |
|---|---|---|
| 1.91 | Expected goals (xG) | 3.67Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 15Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Oţelul | Statistic | Fcsb |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 70%Lead | Pass accuracy | 66% |
| 277Lead | Accurate passes | 274 |
| 393 | Total passes | 414Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Oţelul | Statistic | Fcsb |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Oţelul | Statistic | Fcsb |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Oţelul | Statistic | Fcsb |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.