Match statistics snapshot
- Oţelul created the clearer chances on xG (0.91 vs 0.48, Δ 0.43).
- Oţelul fired more attempts (10 vs 7 shots).
- Oţelul was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Oţelul | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 0.91Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.48 |
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 4Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Oţelul | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 64% | Pass accuracy | 68%Lead |
| 197 | Accurate passes | 292Lead |
| 309 | Total passes | 427Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Oţelul | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Oţelul | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Oţelul | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 17 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 6 | Yellow cards | 6 |
Statistics is not available yet.