Match statistics snapshot
- Oţelul created the clearer chances on xG (1.34 vs 1.27, Δ 0.07).
- Oţelul fired more attempts (19 vs 17 shots).
- Rapid held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Oţelul | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 1.34Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.27 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 17 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Oţelul | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 252 | Accurate passes | 377Lead |
| 324 | Total passes | 454Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Oţelul | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 13Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Oţelul | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Oţelul | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |