Match statistics snapshot
- Oţelul created the clearer chances on xG (0.82 vs 0.52, Δ 0.30).
- Oţelul fired more attempts (11 vs 8 shots).
- Oţelul was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Oţelul | Statistic | U Craiova 1948 |
|---|---|---|
| 0.82Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.52 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Oţelul | Statistic | U Craiova 1948 |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 61% | Pass accuracy | 74%Lead |
| 206 | Accurate passes | 317Lead |
| 335 | Total passes | 430Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Oţelul | Statistic | U Craiova 1948 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Oţelul | Statistic | U Craiova 1948 |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Oţelul | Statistic | U Craiova 1948 |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.