Match statistics snapshot
- Oţelul created the clearer chances on xG (0.96 vs 0.62, Δ 0.34).
- Oţelul fired more attempts (10 vs 9 shots).
- Universitatea Cluj was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Oţelul | Statistic | Universitatea Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 0.96Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.62 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Oţelul | Statistic | Universitatea Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 76%Lead |
| 379Lead | Accurate passes | 376 |
| 508Lead | Total passes | 495 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Oţelul | Statistic | Universitatea Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 2Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Oţelul | Statistic | Universitatea Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Oţelul | Statistic | Universitatea Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.