Match statistics snapshot
- Real Betis created the clearer chances on xG (1.24 vs 2.24, Δ 1.00).
- Real Betis fired more attempts (15 vs 13 shots).
- Real Betis was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 23%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Oviedo | Statistic | Real Betis |
|---|---|---|
1.24 | Expected goals (xG)Quality of chances created — not just shot count. | 2.24Lead |
2 | OffsidesTiming of runs — high counts can mean aggressive lines. | 1Lead |
8 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
5 | Shots off target | 7Lead |
3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
13 | Total shotsAll attempts including blocked and off-target. | 15Lead |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Oviedo | Statistic | Real Betis |
|---|---|---|
42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
80% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
314 | Accurate passes | 480Lead |
393 | Total passes | 564Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Oviedo | Statistic | Real Betis |
|---|---|---|
5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Oviedo | Statistic | Real Betis |
|---|---|---|
5Lead | Blocked shotsDefensive actions — also counts as part of attacking pressure faced. | 2 |
5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
-0.76 | Goals preventedKeeper performance vs expected — positive is above average. | -0.76 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Oviedo | Statistic | Real Betis |
|---|---|---|
15 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Scouting-style duels — each row compares both teams, shows share of the pie, and who had the edge. Categories summarize who won more signals.
How clinical and dangerous each attack was — not just how often they shot, but where and how good those chances were.
Real Betis leads this block
Real Betis leads shot accuracy (+73% vs Oviedo)
Real Betis leads shot accuracy (+73% vs Oviedo)
Real Betis leads shot quality (+57% vs Oviedo)
Real Betis leads (67% vs 62%).
Playing style signals: whether chances came from patient possession or direct vertical play.
Real Betis leads possession efficiency (+31% vs Oviedo)
Real Betis leads possession efficiency (+31% vs Oviedo)
Real Betis — slower buildup (more passes per shot)
Territorial dominance built from box presence, set pieces, and sustained threat.
Real Betis leads this block
Real Betis had the edge in 1 of 1 signals in this block.
Real Betis leads (30 vs 29).
How well each side limited chance quality and how demanding the keepers’ workload was.
Real Betis leads this block
Real Betis — stronger shot quality allowed
Real Betis — stronger shot quality allowed
Real Betis leads keeper workload (+38% vs Oviedo)
Archetype ratings you can map to card modifiers, AI behaviour, or match narratives.
Oviedo leads (21.0 vs 10.0).
Real Betis leads (49.3 vs 33.6).
Oviedo leads (13.0 vs 12.0).
Real Betis leads (0.149 vs 0.095).
Real Betis leads (90.5 vs 85.1).
Oviedo leads (23.0 vs 11.0).