Match statistics snapshot
- Hull City created the clearer chances on xG (0.80 vs 1.02, Δ 0.22).
- Hull City fired more attempts (12 vs 4 shots).
- Oxford United was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Oxford United | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 0.80 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.02Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Oxford United | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 295 | Accurate passes | 530Lead |
| 382 | Total passes | 613Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Oxford United | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Oxford United | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -0.14 | Goals prevented | -0.14 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Oxford United | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.