Match statistics snapshot
- Tigres UANL fired more attempts (14 vs 12 shots).
- Pachuca was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 7%).
- Tigres UANL held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Pachuca | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 3 | Shots off target | 10Lead |
| 8Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Pachuca | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 67% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 228 | Accurate passes | 340Lead |
| 340 | Total passes | 432Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Pachuca | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Pachuca | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Pachuca | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 12 |
| 1 | Red cards | 1 |
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.