Match statistics snapshot
- Cavalry FC fired more attempts (12 vs 9 shots).
- Pacific FC was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 25%).
- Cavalry FC held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Pacific Fc | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Pacific Fc | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 360 | Accurate passes | 429Lead |
| 449 | Total passes | 520Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Pacific Fc | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Pacific Fc | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Pacific Fc | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.