Match statistics snapshot
- Cavalry FC fired more attempts (17 vs 10 shots).
- Cavalry FC was more accurate in front of goal (53% on target vs 10%).
- Cavalry FC held more of the ball (70% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Pacific Fc | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Pacific Fc | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 30% | Ball possession | 70%Lead |
| 68% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 179 | Accurate passes | 532Lead |
| 264 | Total passes | 623Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Pacific Fc | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Pacific Fc | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Pacific Fc | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| 2 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 4 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.