Match statistics snapshot
- Cavalry FC fired more attempts (17 vs 14 shots).
- Pacific FC was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 29%).
- Cavalry FC held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Pacific Fc | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 7 |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 10 |
| 4 |
| 4 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Pacific Fc | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 268 | Accurate passes | 367Lead |
| 335 | Total passes | 430Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Pacific Fc | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Pacific Fc | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Pacific Fc | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |