Match statistics snapshot
- Cavalry FC created the clearer chances on xG (1.46 vs 2.62, Δ 1.16).
- Cavalry FC fired more attempts (16 vs 13 shots).
- Cavalry FC was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 8%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Pacific Fc | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.46 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.62Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Pacific Fc | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 412Lead | Accurate passes | 271 |
| 509Lead | Total passes | 363 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Pacific Fc | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Pacific Fc | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Pacific Fc | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.