Match statistics snapshot
- Pacific FC fired more attempts (21 vs 6 shots).
- Forge was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Pacific Fc | Statistic | Forge |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 14Lead | Shots off target |
| 3 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Pacific Fc | Statistic | Forge |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 442Lead | Accurate passes | 397 |
| 506Lead | Total passes | 476 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Pacific Fc | Statistic | Forge |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Pacific Fc | Statistic | Forge |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Pacific Fc | Statistic | Forge |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.