Match statistics snapshot
- Pacific FC fired more attempts (10 vs 8 shots).
- Forge was more accurate in front of goal (75% on target vs 50%).
- Forge held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Pacific Fc | Statistic | Forge |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 5Lead |
| 0 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Pacific Fc | Statistic | Forge |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 71% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 230 | Accurate passes | 369Lead |
| 323 | Total passes | 461Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Pacific Fc | Statistic | Forge |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Pacific Fc | Statistic | Forge |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Pacific Fc | Statistic | Forge |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 15Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |