Match statistics snapshot
- Forge created the clearer chances on xG (0.25 vs 0.96, Δ 0.71).
- Forge fired more attempts (10 vs 3 shots).
- Forge was more accurate in front of goal (30% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Pacific Fc | Statistic | Forge |
|---|---|---|
| 0.25 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.96Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 1 | Shots inside the box | 3Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 0 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Total shots | 10Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Pacific Fc | Statistic | Forge |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 76%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 319Lead | Accurate passes | 295 |
| 417Lead | Total passes | 399 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Pacific Fc | Statistic | Forge |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Pacific Fc | Statistic | Forge |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Pacific Fc | Statistic | Forge |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.