Match statistics snapshot
- Mantova created the clearer chances on xG (1.49 vs 1.70, Δ 0.21).
- Padova fired more attempts (20 vs 16 shots).
- Padova held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Padova | Statistic | Mantova |
|---|---|---|
| 1.49 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.70Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 7 | Shots outside the box | 7 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 16 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Padova | Statistic | Mantova |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 381Lead | Accurate passes | 275 |
| 469Lead | Total passes | 346 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Padova | Statistic | Mantova |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Padova | Statistic | Mantova |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Padova | Statistic | Mantova |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 20 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.