Match statistics snapshot
- Pafos created the clearer chances on xG (2.20 vs 0.70, Δ 1.50).
- Pafos fired more attempts (15 vs 6 shots).
- Pafos was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Pafos | Statistic | Enosis |
|---|---|---|
| 2.20Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.70 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Pafos | Statistic | Enosis |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 472Lead | Accurate passes | 216 |
| 561Lead | Total passes | 268 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Pafos | Statistic | Enosis |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Pafos | Statistic | Enosis |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Pafos | Statistic | Enosis |
|---|---|---|
| 23 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.