Match statistics snapshot
- Everton de Vina created the clearer chances on xG (1.08 vs 1.53, Δ 0.45).
- Everton de Vina fired more attempts (10 vs 8 shots).
- Everton de Vina was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Palestino | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 1.08 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.53Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 10Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Palestino | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 78%Lead | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 290Lead | Accurate passes | 214 |
| 372Lead | Total passes | 296 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Palestino | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Palestino | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Palestino | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 26 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 6 | Yellow cards | 5Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.