Match statistics snapshot
- Lamia was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 14%).
- Panetolikos held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Panetolikos | Statistic | Lamia |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots off target |
| 6 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Panetolikos | Statistic | Lamia |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 419Lead | Accurate passes | 272 |
| 509Lead | Total passes | 357 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Panetolikos | Statistic | Lamia |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Panetolikos | Statistic | Lamia |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Panetolikos | Statistic | Lamia |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |