Match statistics snapshot
- Panetolikos fired more attempts (15 vs 13 shots).
- Panetolikos was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 0%).
- Volos NFC held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Panetolikos | Statistic | Volos Nfc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Panetolikos | Statistic | Volos Nfc |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 221 | Accurate passes | 391Lead |
| 297 | Total passes | 460Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Panetolikos | Statistic | Volos Nfc |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Panetolikos | Statistic | Volos Nfc |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Panetolikos | Statistic | Volos Nfc |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.