Match statistics snapshot
- Club Brugge KV created the clearer chances on xG (0.21 vs 2.75, Δ 2.54).
- Club Brugge KV fired more attempts (14 vs 6 shots).
- Club Brugge KV was more accurate in front of goal (29% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Paok | Statistic | Club Brugge Kv |
|---|---|---|
| 0.21 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.75Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Paok | Statistic | Club Brugge Kv |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 376 | Accurate passes | 418Lead |
| 456 | Total passes | 505Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Paok | Statistic | Club Brugge Kv |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Paok | Statistic | Club Brugge Kv |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Paok | Statistic | Club Brugge Kv |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |