Match statistics snapshot
- PAOK created the clearer chances on xG (2.02 vs 0.72, Δ 1.30).
- PAOK fired more attempts (28 vs 6 shots).
- FCSB was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Paok | Statistic | Fcsb |
|---|---|---|
| 2.02Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.72 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 20Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 28Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Paok | Statistic | Fcsb |
|---|---|---|
| 65%Lead | Ball possession | 35% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 485Lead | Accurate passes | 255 |
| 580Lead | Total passes | 332 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Paok | Statistic | Fcsb |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Paok | Statistic | Fcsb |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| 1.53 | Goals prevented | 1.53 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Paok | Statistic | Fcsb |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 6 |
Statistics is not available yet.