Match statistics snapshot
- Plzen created the clearer chances on xG (1.53 vs 2.72, Δ 1.19).
- PAOK fired more attempts (19 vs 11 shots).
- Plzen was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 42%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Paok | Statistic | Plzen |
|---|---|---|
| 1.53 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.72Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 3Lead |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 10 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Paok | Statistic | Plzen |
|---|---|---|
| 75%Lead | Ball possession | 25% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 60% |
| 547Lead | Accurate passes | 127 |
| 634Lead | Total passes | 210 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Paok | Statistic | Plzen |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Paok | Statistic | Plzen |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| 1.00 | Goals prevented | 1.00 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Paok | Statistic | Plzen |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |