Match statistics snapshot
- Lens created the clearer chances on xG (0.61 vs 3.76, Δ 3.15).
- Lens fired more attempts (17 vs 11 shots).
- Paris FC was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 35%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Paris Fc | Statistic | Lens |
|---|---|---|
| 0.61 | Expected goals (xG) | 3.76Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 6 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 17Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 6 | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Paris Fc | Statistic | Lens |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 501Lead | Accurate passes | 352 |
| 588Lead | Total passes | 415 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Paris Fc | Statistic | Lens |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Paris Fc | Statistic | Lens |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| 1.17 | Goals prevented | 1.17 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Paris Fc | Statistic | Lens |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |